APPROACHES AND STRATEGIES IN TEACHING AND
LEARNING OF MATHEMATICS
Five E model
It is a process in which the
teacher plans structured activities or creates learning environments,
implements them in classrooms, guides students to construct the knowledge or
discover the knowledge through this activities and gives feedback for further
progress or improvement in learning.
The structured activities or learning environment are planned based on
various methods and techniques depending on the purpose for which they are
designed. The present trend is to plan the learning environments based on some
Instructional design model.
Instructional
design model.
An Instructional design is a decision
making process by means of which the most appropriate instructional strategy is
selected to achieve an identified objective under a set of conditions.
Instructional design requires development of learning material using learning
theories and instructional strategies to ensure quality of design, delivery and
effectiveness of transfer of learning to intended outcomes.
It provides wider scope for teachers to
plan and create learning environments and facilitate learning. Within the broad
frame work of the instructional design, the teacher wisely selects and
organizes suitable methods and strategies depending on the content category and
the objectives to be achieved. It also involves assessment and evaluation
strategies.
The
various questions answered by the instructional design are presented in the
following diagram.
The recommendation
made by NCF 2005 is that the mode of transaction should be through
constructivism. Hence, instructional design models constructivism are to be
followed. There are several instructional design models based constructivism
and one of the suitable model for science and mathematics subjects and most
often used model is Five E’s model
developed by Roger Bybee.
Five E’s Model Stage
State-1: Engage:
This
stage assess the previous knowledge of the learner and helps them become
engaged in a new concept through the use of short activities that promote
curiosity and elicit prior knowledge. The aim is to organize students’ thinking
toward the learning outcomes of the current activities.
Facilitating learning environment,
learning activities and situations and focusing the minds of learners on the
higher order learning tasks is the main purpose of this stage. As far as
possible present real life situations to engage student’s attention on learning
tasks.
The different ways of engaging
learners are:
·
Ask
open ended questions.
·
Act
out a problematic situation.
·
Define
a problem.
·
Show
a surprising event.
·
Note
unexpected phenomenon.
·
Consider
possible responses to questions.
·
Present
situations where student’s perceptions vary.
Stage-2: Explore:
In this stage, learners are
guided to explore and find answers for the questions/issues raised during the
engage stage. Teacher role is to structure and present learning environment
which facilitate learners to involve in investigative activities and provide opportunities
for students to get directly involved with discovery process and construction
of knowledge.
Expose the students to a variety of
experiences at this stage. These experiences may involve observations of events
or objects, manipulations of materials, work with simulations, examinations of
representations, viewing a short video, or reading. These experiences provide a
common basis for all students that the teacher can use the assist them in
identifying and developing concepts and skills.
Some
of the investigative activities can be as follows:
·
Provide
structured activities.
·
Have
them work in teams.
·
Experiment
with materials.
·
Use
their inquiry to drive the process.
·
Employ
problem solving strategies.
·
Identify
sequence or patterns of events.
·
Brainstorm
possible alternatives.
According to constructivist
approaches, it is very suitable to structure small groups
(3 to 6 members) while involving
students in the above mentioned activities or any appropriate activity.
Co-operative learning strategies are most suitable for this purpose.
Stage-3: Explain:
Here students are provided with
opportunity to explain their understanding of their experiences from the
explore phase. The questions and discussion lead students to patterns,
regularities, and/or similarities and prompt them to describe concepts or
skills in their own words.
At the second stage, students
have engaged in the learning activities and through mutual interactions
discovered the knowledge (scientific facts, concepts, generalizations and
procedures) and constructed. Expressing this abstract knowledge through
communicable form is the purpose of the third stage.
Students can express the
constructed knowledge in different ways as follows:
·
Explain
the constructed ideas.
·
Construct
and explain a model.
·
Represent
ideas through pictures/figures/graphs.
·
Represent
information through symbols.
·
Present
a summary based on the data.
·
Present
oral and written reports.
·
Review
and criticize solutions.
Stage-4: Expand/Elaborate:
This phase challenges students to extend
their understandings or skills and/or to practicae them. Through new
experiences at this time, students develop deeper understanding, an extended
conceptural framework, and improved skills. Some of the tasks, such as reading
an article, may be done as homework and discussed during the following class
period.
In
the fourth stage, the teacher provides opportunities and guidance for students
to apply the constructed knowledge in several real life situations. The
students can also correlate the newly constructed knowledge to other related
fields of knowledge. These new relationships can further lead to new
discoveries or new understandings.
·
Apply knowledge and skills in real life
situations.
·
Transfer knowledge and skills.
·
Ask new questions.
Stage-5: Evaluate:
The final phase of the instructional model
encourages students to assess their understanding and abilities and provides
opportunity for the teacher to evaluate student progress toward achieving the
learning objectives for the activity. The tasks may involve writing summaries,
applying concepts and skills to novel situations, constructing a concept map.
Or taking a quiz.
At
this stage the teacher evaluates whether the students have constructed the
knowledge completely and correctly and also have developed conceptual
understandings. According to constructivist theory, evaluation should be as far
as possible diagnostic in nature.
The
tools that are suitable for this purpose are:
·
Checklists for observations.
·
Projects and problem based learning
products.
·
Achievement and attainment tests.
·
Concept/mind mappings.
·
Portfolios assessments.
·
Rubrics.
·
Student interviews
Example:
Subject: Geometry
Class: IX
Topic:
Length of segment parallel to either X or Y axis.
Technique:
5 E Model
1.ENGAGE
|
Show pieces of straws to the class and
ask them how they can find the length of the same. Obviously they will want
to use a measuring scale. Ask them for methods to find the length of a straw
without using a measuring scale. Ask them for methods to find the length of a
straw without using a measuring scale. Show them diferent types of paper as
plain paper, graph paper, craft paper and see if the length of the straws can
be measured. Apparently a graph paper comes in handy. That is because there
is a relationship between the co-ordinates of points and the length of the
segment determined by two such points. Here the teacher announces that the
class is going to discover this relationship to find the length of a segment.
|
2.EXPLORE
|
Have points and their co-ordinates
put up on the chalkboard as follows:
Group I :i) A (3,6) B (5,6) ii) T (5,8) V
(1,8)
Group II: i) X (7,14) Y (7,10)
ii) M (3,2) N (3,8) Is there any common characteristics of each group? Where
would the pair D (8, 8) and E (8,4) go? Students are encouraged to plot one
pair on their graph papers. All students of Group I compare their segments
and derive one common property. The same is done by Group II. Can the length
of the segment be found out? Is there a relationship between the co-ordinates
of the endpoints and the length of the segment?
|
3. EXPLAIN
|
The
students are encouraged to explain this relationship in their own words. On
the basis of their work they devise a formula to find the length of the
segment parallel to X asis. Similarly find the length of the segment parallel
to y axis.
|
4. ELABORATE
|
Where will this formula be
useful? Here the teacher can probe for an answer.
|
5. EVALUATE
|
Give each Student a card with
co-ordinates of a point. Students pair up and try to find the length of the
segment formed. Be sure that the co-ordinates are such that the segment
formed must be parallel to one of the two axes. Pair up with a different
student and now find the length of the new segment.
|
The students devise the formula on their own. They get adequate
practice through the game. The teacher only facilitates through use of
appropriate questions.
APPROACHES AND MODELS OF TEACHING
MATHEMATICS
Inducto-Deductive
approach:
INDUCTIVE
METHOD
Inductive method is advocated by
Pestalozzi and Francis Bacon. Inductive method is based on induction. Induction
is the process of proving a universal truth or a theorem by showing that if it
is true of any particular case, it is true of the next case in the same serial
order and hence true for any such cases. Thus it is a method of arriving at a
formula or a rule by observing a sufficient number of particular instances. If
one rule applies to a particular case and is equally applicable to different similar
cases, it is accepted as a general rule or formula. Therefore, inductive method
proceeds from,
i)
Particular cases to general rules or formulae.
ii)
Concrete instance to abstract rules.
iii)
Known to unknown.
iv)
Simple to complex.
This method has been found to be very
suitable for the teaching of mathematics because many mathematical formulae and
generalizations are the results of induction.
For example: If we wish to frame
the formula (a-b)2 =a2 – 2ab + b2. Let the
students actually multiply
(a-b) x (a-b) and find out the
product. They may then be asked to find the answers for (p-q)2,
(l-m)2 etc. by actually multiplication. After this they be asked to
observe results and be helped to make generalization to get the required
formula.
Steps in Inductive Method
1. Selection
of a number of cases.
2. Observation
of the case under given conditions.
3. Investigation
and analysis.
4. Finding
common relations.
5. Arriving
at generalization.
6. Verification
or application.
Example-1:
If two parallel lines are cut by a
transversal the alternate angles are equal.
Step-1: Selection of a number of cases:
Students may be asked to draw at least three pairs of parallel lines cut by transversal and mark the pair of alternate angles as a, b ,c, d.
The Students can be asked to
measure the angles a, b, c, and d, and tabulate the results.
Step-2: Observation of the cases under given conditions:
By appropriate questioning the
students may be asked to observe the cases and see the common property and
similarity of the given instances i.e.
i)
A pair of parallel lines cut by a transversal
ii)
∟a and ∟c (a pair of alternate angles)
∟b and ∟d (a pair
of alternate angles)
Step-3: Investigation and analysis for common properties and
relations.
The students are asked to analyse the data
tabulated by them and draw inferences regarding common properties
Cases
|
m ∟a
|
m ∟b
|
m ∟c
|
m ∟d
|
Case-(i)
|
60
|
42
|
60
|
42
|
Case-(ii)
|
55
|
60
|
55
|
60
|
Case-(iii)
|
45
|
75
|
45
|
75
|
Step-4: Finding common relations:
From the tabulated data it can be observed
that
m∟a= m ∟c
m∟b= m ∟d
Step-5:
Arriving at generalization:
a = c (a and c are alternate angles)
b = d (b and d are alternate angles)
. ..
Alternate angles are equal i.e. when two parallel lines are cut by a
transversal, the alternate angles are equal.
Step-6: Verification or application:
Require the students to verify the
validity of the generalization by applying it to a new situation.
Merits of Inductive method
1.
It helps in understanding.
2.
It is logical method and develops critical
thinking.
3.
It encourages active participation of the
students in learning.
4.
It provides ample opportunities for exploration
and observation.
5.
It sustains the students’ interest as they
proceed from known to unknown.
6.
It curbs the tendency to rote learning as it
clears the doubts of the students.
7.
It facilitates meaningful learning.
8.
It enhances self-confidence.
9.
It is helpful for beginners as it provides a
number of concrete examples.
10.
It encourages experimentation, observation,
analytical thinking and reasoning.
11.
It facilitates fixation and retention of
mathematical concepts, rules and formulae.
12.
It helps in increasing the pupil-teacher
contact.
13.
It does not burden the mind. Formula becomes
easy to remember.
14.
It discourages cramming and also reduces home
work.
Demerits of Inductive method
1.
This method is limited in range and is not
suitable for all topics. Certain complex and complicated formula cannot be
generalized in this manner.
2.
It is lengthy, time consuming and laborious
method.
3.
Inductive reasoning is not absolutely conclusive
because the generalization made with the help of a few specific examples may
not holds good in all cases.
4.
We don’t complete the study of a topic simply by
discovering a formula but a lot of supplementary work and practice is required
for fixing the topic in learner’s mind.
5.
This method is not suitable for higher classes
because higher order mathematical principles cannot be generalized through the
observation of concrete cases.
6.
It is not suitable for mathematically gifted
students as unnecessary details and too many examples make the teaching dull
and boring.
Applicability of Inductive method
Inductive method is most suitable
where
·
Rules are to be formulated.
·
Definitions are to be formulated.
·
Formulae are to be derived.
·
Generalizations or laws are to be arrived at.
DEDUCTIVE METHOD
Deductive method is based on deductive
reasoning. Deductive reasoning is the process of drawing logical inferences
from established facts or fundamental assumptions. Contrary to inductive
method, in deductive method we begin with the formula, or rule or
generalization and apply it to a particular case. In this method, the teacher
presents the known facts or generalization and draws inferences regarding the
unknown, following a network of reasoning. Therefore, deductive method proceeds
from:
i)
General rule to specific instances.
ii)
Unknown rule to known case.
iii)
Abstract rule to concrete instance.
iv)
Complex rule to simple example.
Example: the formula. Simple interest = Principal X rate
X time
100
Steps in Deductive
method
Deductive method of teaching
follows the steps given below for effective teaching.
1. Clear recognition of the problem:
A clear recognition of the problem statement provides the basic link for the
thinking process and the solution to the problem.
2. Search for a tentative hypothesis:
The second step in deductive method is the search for tentative hypothesis, a
tentative solution to the problem.
3. Formulation of tentative hypothesis:
The search for the solution leads to the formulation of a tentative hypothesis
that appears to have promise as a possible or probable solution to the problem.
The tentative hypothesis has its basis on certain axioms or postulates, or
propositions or rules and formulae that have been accepted to be true.
4. Verification: Finally the
hypothesis that has been formulated is to be verified as the right solution to
the problem at hand.
Example: Find the area of an
equilateral triangle of side 3 cm.
Step-1: Clear recognition of
problem.
The student analyses the problem as to
what is given and what is to be found out.
Given: An equilateral triangle of side 3 cm.
Problem: To find its area.
Step-2: Search for tentative
hypothesis:
The student analyses various possible
solutions i.e. various formulae for the area of triangle that they have
encountered before such as, A=½ b h; A = ½ a b
A = √s(s-a)s(s-b)s(s-c), A = √3/4 a2
Step-3: Formulation of tentative
hypothesis:
The student select A =√3/4 a2
as a possible hypothesis as it is the formula to find the area of an
equilateral triangle.
Step-4: Verification:
The student verifies the hypothesis
A =√3/4 a2 Sq. unit
A =√3/4 x 32
i.e. A =√3/4 x 9 Sq.cm
Deductive method
is very frequently followed by teachers of mathematics, as mathematics is a
deductive science. Problems can be solved by applying formulae and rules that
have been already derived. Theorems and riders can be deducted from theorems
which have been already proved, definitions that have been stated and
postulates and axioms that have been accepted.
Differences between Inductive and Deductive
methods:
INDUCTIVE METHOD
|
DEDUCTIVE METHOD
|
1. In
this method we proceed from ‘particular to general’, from example to general
rule’, and from ‘concrete to abstract’.
|
1. In this method, we proceed from general to particular,
from general to rule to example and from abstract to concrete.
|
2. In this method, Child acts as researcher and draws law
or formula by active participation.
|
2. In this formulae and laws are already told to the
child. He is not able to verify the law or formula.
|
3. By this method, a habit of discovery is developed in
students.
|
3. By this method, a habit of discovery is not developed
in students.
|
4. This is best method of teaching.
|
4. This is best method of learning.
|
5. Inductive method is suitable for teaching in lower
classes.
|
5. This method is suitable for teaching in higher classes.
|
6. In this method, children themselves decide the law or
formula. It develops self-reliance and self-confidence in them.
|
6. In this method laws and formulae are told in advance so
they do not gain any confidence.
|
7. This method is helpful in discovering new knowledge.
|
7. In this method children use the knowledge gained by
others.
|
8. This is a scientific method by which scientific
attitude is developed in students.
|
8. This method does not give any scope for developing
scientific attitude in children.
|
9. This method is the way of discovery and research.
|
9. This method is the way of following because child
follow the given laws and principles.
|
10. In this method, both the teacher and pupils are
active. So this is a student-centered method.
|
10. In this, teacher is more active and pupil is a passive
learner.so this is a teacher-centered method.
|
11. This method give emphasis on original and creative
work.
|
11. This method gives emphasis on problem-solving.
|
12. Teaching-learning process becomes interesting by the
use of this method.
|
12. Teaching-learning process becomes dull by the use of
this method.
|
13. In this method, every step is important to write so
many steps.
|
13. In this method children do not learn and children
learn to write them.
|
14. This is a slow method, so it needs more labour and
time.
|
14. This is a fast method so it needs less labour and
times.
|
15. This is a psychological method which is understanding
centered.
|
15. This is an unpsychological method and is
memory-centered.
|
ANALYTIC METHOD
The word ‘analytic’ is derived from
the word ‘analysis’ which means ‘breaking up’ or resolving a thing into its
constituent elements. This method is based on analysis and therefore in this
method we break up the problem in hand into its constituent parts so that it
ultimately gets connected with something obvious, or already known. In this
process we start with what is to be found out (unknown) and then think of
further steps and possibilities which may connect with the known and find out
the desired result. Hence in this method we proceed from unknown to known, from
abstract to concrete and from complex to simple. This method is particularly
useful for solving problems in arithmetic, algebra, geometry and trigonometry.
Example: If a/b = c/d prove that ac
+ 3b2 = c2 + 3bd
bc dc
To prove this using analytic
method, begin from the unknown.
The unknown is ac + 3b2 = c2
+ 3bd
bc dc
ac + 3b2 = c2
+ 3bd is true
bc dc
ifac + 3b2 = c2
+ 3bdis true
b d
if d (ac+3b2) = b (c2 +
3b2d)
dac + 3db2= bc2
+ 3db2
ifdac = bc2
if da = bc
if a/b = c/d which is given to
be true.
∴ac
+ 3b2 = c2 + 3bd
bc dc
In analysis the reasoning is as
follows:
‘C’ is true if ‘B’ is true
‘B’ is true if ‘A’ is true
∴
‘C’ is true
Merits of Analytic Method
1. It
leaves no doubts in the minds of the students as every step is justified.
2. It
is a psychological method.
3. It
facilitates clear understanding of the subject matter as every step is derived
by the student himself.
4. It
helps in developing the spirit of enquiry and discovery among the students.
5. No
cramming is necessitated in this method as each step has its reason and
justification.
6. Students
take active role in the learning process resulting in longer retention and
easier recall of what they learn.
7. It
develops self-confidence in the students as they tackle the problems
confidently and intelligently.
8. It
develops thinking and reasoning power among the students.
Demerits of Analytic Method
1.
It is a lengthy, time consuming method and
therefore not economical.
2.
With this method it is difficult to acquire
efficiency and speed.
3.
This method may not be suitable for all topics
of mathematics.
4.
In this method information is not presented in a
well-organized manner.
5.
This method may not be very effective for below
average students who would find it difficult to follow the analytical
reasoning.
Applicability of Analytic Method
Analytic Method, though it has got certain
limitations, is very effective for teaching how to solve complex mathematical
problems, in proving theorems and riders and teaching many topics from
algebra. This method is particularly
useful for solving problems in arithmetic, algebra, geometry and trigonometry.
SYNTHETIC
METHOD
‘Synthetic’ is derived from the word
‘Synthesis’. Synthesis is the complement of analysis. To synthesise is to
combine the constituent elements to produce something new. In this method we
start with something already known and connect it with the unknown part of the
statement. Therefore, in this method one proceed from known to unknown. It is
the process of combining known bits of information to reach the point where
unknown information becomes obvious and true. In synthetic method the reasoning
is as follows “Since A is true, B is true”.
The usual forms of statements of proofs
found in textbook are examples of synthetic method. Beginning with known
definitions, assumptions and axioms, the sequence of steps are deducted and
conclusions (unknown) are arrived at.
Synthetic method is best suited for the
final presentation of proofs of theorems and solutions to problems in a logical
and systematic manner. However, it is advisable to adopt synthetic method
following analytic method.
Example: If a/b = c/d , prove that ac + 3b2 = c2
+ 3bd
bc dc
In synthetic method, one has
to begin with the known i.e. a/b = c/d and reach the unknown i.e. ac + 3b2
= c2 + 3bd
bc dc
Proof: a/b = c/d (known)
Adding 3b/c on both sides we get
a/b + 3b/c = c/d + 3b/c
ac + 3b2 = c2
+ 3bd
bc dc
Thus beginning with the known, the
unknown is reached. But why +3b/c is
added is not explained.
In synthetic method the reasoning is as follows.
A is true.
∴
B is true and
∴
C is true
Merits of Synthetic
Method
1.
This method is logical as in this method one
proceeds from the known to unknown.
2.
It is short and elegant.
3.
It facilitates speed and efficiency.
4.
It is more effective for slow learners.
Demerits of Synthetic method
1. It
leaves many doubts in the minds of the learner and offers no explanations for
them.
2. As
it does not justify all the steps, recall of all the steps may not be possible.
3. There
is no scope for discovery and enquiry in this method.
4. It
makes the students passive listeners and encourage rote memorization.
5. If
the students forget the sequence of steps, it could be very difficult to
reconstruct the proof/Solutions.
Application of Synthetic method
Synthetic method is best suited for the
final presentation of proofs of theorems and solutions to problems in a logical
and systematic manner. Many teachers prefer this method for teaching
mathematics. However it is advisable to adopt synthetic method following
analytical method.
Differences between Analytic and Synthetic
methods:
ANALYTIC METHOD
|
SYNTHETIC METHOD
|
1. We proceed from unknown to known or from conclusion to
hypothesis.
|
1. We proceed from known to
unknown or hypothesis to conclusion.
|
2. It is based on inductive
reasoning.
|
2. It is based on deductive
reasoning.
|
3. It is based upon heuristic
approach.
|
3. It is not based on
heuristic approach.
|
4. It is laborious and very
lengthy method.
|
4. It is short and quick
method.
|
5. It helps in the development
of self-confidence and self-reliance.
|
5. No development of
self-reliance and Self-confidence. With the help of this method.
|
6. Helps in the development of
intellectual abilities.
|
6. It does not help in the
developments of intellectual abilities.
|
7. It is psychological in
nature.
|
|
8. Approach is scientific in
nature.
|
8. Approach is unscientific in
nature.
|
9. It is a formative method.
|
9. It is an informative
method.
|
10. It develops originality
and creativity with reasoning.
|
10. More stress on memory of the
child without reasoning.
|
11. This method leads in the
discovery of something new.
|
11. This method does not lead
on the discovery of something new
|
12. Subject matter becomes
solid and durable for a longer time.
|
12. It is time being and the
content is not durable for a longer time.
|
13. Proof can be easily
recollected if forgotten.
|
13. Once forgotten proof
cannot be recollected.
|
14. It is process of thinking.
|
14. It is product of thinking.
|
15. Close contact between the
teacher and the taught.
|
15. No such intimate contact
between them.
|
GUIDED
DISCOVERY APPROACH
Guided
discovery has emerged as a valuable strategy of teaching mathematics. In
teaching, the teacher exercises some guidance over the learner’s behaviour. If
this guidance is limited, them guided discovery can take place. In this
strategy of teaching, the pupils is encouraged to think for himself and to
discover general principles from situations, which may be contrived by the
teacher if necessary.
True discovery teaching is a process, which
focuses on the learner. The pupils have a tendency to jump conclusions quickly
to generalize on a very limited data, moreover how many students are
sufficiently brilliant to discover everything they are to know in mathematics.
Bruner says discovery is a process, a way
of approaching problems rather than the product of the knowledge. It is his
contentions that process of discovery can become generalized abilities though
exercise of solving problems and the practice.
Basically it is a process that presents
mathematics in a way that makes some sense to the learner. It is an
instructional process in which the learner is placed in a situation where he is
free to explore, manipulate materials, investigate and concluded. The teacher
assumes the role as a guide. He helps the learner to draw upon ideas, concepts
and skills that have already been learnt in order to conclude new knowledge
asking appropriate questions will do a great deal to encourage the situation.
Principles or Steps
of Guided Discovery:
1. Motivation: Psychologist believe that almost
all children have a built in will to learn. It is desired to know the external
world. It is the basic for human learning.
Motivation can be done in variety though proper questions, solving
problems, through examples, through using visual aids, methods, charts, etc.
2. Structure:
It states
that any body of knowledge can be organized in such a way that almost every
student can understand it. The form of knowledge, which is presented to the children,
can be made simple that a learner understands it is a recognized form.
At
this stage of thinking the message of the teacher should be through movements,
actions, and experience. At symbolic level children can translate experiences
into language. Level of thinking makes use of pictures and diagrams, which
allow the children to be learnt in simple ways. Anything that is easily
understood is the powerful presentation. New relationship can be established
between facts through powerful presentation.
3. Sequence:The lesson should follow
sequential arrangement of the subject matter. Usually we start with the
diagrams and pictorial representation to symbolic communication. The teacher
can explain or present the matter through diagrams and pictures and explain the
very content of them.
4. Reinforcement:
In order to
achieve mastery over the knowledge, we should get feedback. The pupils are made
to use the acquired knowledge in different situations, so that they learn
better and by practice understanding of the subject will be better.
1.
Concept
formation lessons.
2.
Concept
utilization lessons.
3.
MarticeTenon
lessons.
4.
Concept
enrichment lesson.
CONCEPT
ATTAINMENT MODEL
Concept Attainment
Concept attainment is an indirect instructional strategy
that uses a structured inquiry process. It is based on the work of Jerome
Bruner. In concept attainment, students figure out the attributes of a group or
category that has already been formed by the teacher. To do so, students
compare and contrast examples that contain the attribute. They then separate
them into two groups. Concept attainment, then, is the search for and
identification of attributes that can be used to distinguish examples of a
given group or category from non-examples.
Purpose of
Concept attainment model
Concept
attainment is designed to clarify ideas and to introduce aspects of content. It
engages students into formulating a concept through the use of illustrations,
word cards or specimens called examples. Students who catch onto the idea
before others are able to resolve the concept and then are invited to suggest
their own examples, while other students are still trying to form the concept.
For their reason, concept attainment is well suited to classroom use because
all thinking abilities can be changed throughout the activity. With carefully
chosen examples, it is possible to use concept attainment to teach almost any
concept in all subjects.
Syntax of concept attainment model:
Phase-I:
Presentation of data and identification of concept:
This involves presentation of data to learners. Each unit of
data is a separate example or non-example of the concept. The data may be
events, people, objects, stories, pictures or any other discriminable units.
The learners are informed that there is one idea that all the positive examples
have in common, their task is to develop a hypothesis about the nature of the
concept. The instances are presented in a prearranged order and are labeled
‘yes’ or ‘no’. Learners are asked to compare and justify the attributes of different
examples. Finally, they are asked to name their concepts and state the rules or
definitions of the concepts according to their essential attributes.
Phase-II: Testing Attainment of
the concept:
The students test their attainment of the
concept, first by correctly identifying additional unlabeled examples of the
concept and then by generating their own examples. After this the teacher (and
students) confirm or disconfirm their original hypothesis, revising their
choice of concepts or attributes as necessary.
Phase-III:
Analysis of thinking strategies:
Students begin to analyse the strategies by which they
attain concepts. As we have indicated, some learners initially try broad
constructs and gradually narrow the field, other begin with more discrete
constructs. The learners can describe their patterns, whether they focused on
attributes or concepts, whether they did so one at a time or several at once.
Steps of Concept Attainment:
1. Select and define
a concept.
2. Select the
attributes.
3. Develop positive and negative examples.
4. Introduce the process to the students.
5. Present the example and list the attributes.
6. Develop a concept definition.
7. Give additional examples.
8. Discuss the process with the class.
9. Evaluate.
A Mathematical example:
1.
First the teacher chooses a concept to develop.
(i.e., Math facts that equal to 10).
2.
Begin by making list of both positive “yes” and
negative “no” examples. The examples are put on to sheets of paper or flash
cards.
3.
Positive examples:(Positive examples
contain attributes of the concept to be taught) i.e., 5+5, 11-1, 10x1, 3+4+4, (4x2) +2, 12-2, 15-5,
9+1,
4.
Negative examples: (for examples choose
facts that do not have 10 as the answer) i.e., 6+6,
3
+3, 12-4, 3 x3, 4x4, 16 -5, 6x2, 3+4+6, 2+ (2x3), 16-10,
5.
Designate one area of the chalkboard for the
positive examples and one area for negative examples. A chart could be set up
at the front of the room with two columns-one marked YES and the other marked
with NO.
6.
Present the first card by saying, “This is a
YES.” Place it under the appropriate column.i.e. 5+5 is YES.
7.
Present the next card and say, “This is NO.”
Place it under the NO column. i.e.6+6 is a NO.
8.
Repeat this process until there are three
examples under each column.
9.
Ask the class to look at the three examples
under the YES column and discuss how they are alike (i.e.,5+5,11-1, 2x5, ) Ask
“What do they have in common?”.
10.
For the next
three examples under each column. Several students will have identified the
concept but it is important that they not tell it out loud to the class. They
can however show that they have caught on by giving an example of their own for
each column. At this point, the examples are student-generated. Ask the class
if anyone else has the concept in mind. Students who have not yet defined the
concept are still busy trying to see the similarities of the YES examples.
Place at least three more examples under each column that are
student-generated.
11.
Discuss the
process with the class. Once most students have caught on, they can define the
concept. Once they have pointed out that everything under the YES column has an
answer of 10, then print a new heading at the top of the column (10 facts). The
print a new heading for the NO column (Not 10 facts).
How can we adapt it?
This
activity can be done on the chalkboard, chart paper or overhead projector to a
large or small group. It also works well as one-on-work. Rather than starting
with the teacher’s concept, use a student’s concept. Concept attainment can be
used to introduce or conclude unit of study.
Variations on the Concept Attainment Model
1.
Present all of
the positive examples to the students at once and have them determine the
essential attributes.
2.
Present all of
the positive and negative examples to the students without labeling them as
such. Have them group the examples into the two categories and determine the
essential attributes.
3.
Have the students
define, identify the essential attributes of, and choose positive examples for
a concept already learned in class.
4.
Use the model as
a group activity.
Assessment and Evaluation Considerations
Have the students:
1.
Write the
definition from memory.
2.
Determine
positive and negative examples from a given group.
3.
Create their own
examples of the concept.
4.
“Think aloud”.
5.
Write a learning
log.
6.
Do an oral
presentation.
7.
Create a web,
concept map, flow chart, illustrations, KWL chart, T chart.
Advantages:
1.
Helps to make
connections between what students know and what they will be learning.
2.
Learn how to
examine a concept from a number of perspectives.
3.
Learn how to sort
out relevant information.
4.
Extends their
knowledge of a concept by classifying more than one example of that concept.
5.
Students go
beyond merely associating a key term with a definition.
6.
Concept is
learned more thoroughly and retention is improved.
No comments:
Post a Comment